1. To be honest, I don't read over my papers unless I'm told to do so. I dislike over viewing my work because I just don't like to. Yeah, I agree that reviewing your work many times can help catch a few things. You can indeed find errors, or phrases you can restate for the better of the paper. But, when it comes down to reviewing my paper, I wouldn't unless necessary.
2. "Considering the Evidence" can be used to support your claim. With your own personal experiences, it can help remove the doubts of others who think otherwise if you hadn't have had any examples. Evidence helps get your point across to the reader, thus creating a claim that is hard to retaliate against.
3. Of course the most important part about the section " Academic Writing is an Analysis?" is the explanation of what an analysis and how to "Analyze" Academic Writing. It increases the efficiency of reviewing papers and keep it less chaotic. I say we should review over everything, so I can confirm that I indeed understand the section.
4. I can see that both papers tell you to have a rational paper. However, one of the charateristics tell you to vision the reader, as the rubric does not. Also, the rubric shows more technical points and tips to create a paper. But, both papers expect you to indeed, have a very nice paper.
-Side Note-
Not sure if I answered them right. :T I blame the fire breathing turtles.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Answers
1. I have no idea how I should answer this one. But, I guess I have to. Creating drafts with your own world view would might help you understand things better. Because its being powered by your own view, you, yourself, would better understand it than being powered by the academic world view.
2. Again, I have no idea what I'm talking about. From what I can understand, the commitment standard for a personal world view and an academic world view are indeed different. However, it doesn't mean they cannot co-exist. A personal world view could have an even higher standard, but meets academic standards. Students can play with the rules, as to meeting the academic standard, but also having thier personal world view into their work.
2. Again, I have no idea what I'm talking about. From what I can understand, the commitment standard for a personal world view and an academic world view are indeed different. However, it doesn't mean they cannot co-exist. A personal world view could have an even higher standard, but meets academic standards. Students can play with the rules, as to meeting the academic standard, but also having thier personal world view into their work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)